Sunday, March 13, 2011

Architectural Geology of Boston: The Roxbury Conglomerate (Puddingstone) Part I – The Tectonic Evolution and Journey of Avalonia

"I wonder whether the boys who live in Roxbury and Dorchester are ever moved to tears or
filled with silent awe as they look upon the rocks and fragments of "puddingstone"
abounding in these localities... Yet a lump of puddingstone is a thing to look at, to think
about, to study over, to dream upon, to go crazy with, to beat one's brains out against. Look
at that pebble in it. From what cliff was it broken? On what beach rolled by the waves of
what ocean? How and when embedded in soft ooze, which itself became stone, and by-and-by
was lifted into bald summits and steep cliffs, such as you may seen on Meetinghouse-Hill any
day-yes, and mark the scratches on their faces left when the boulder-carrying glaciers
planed the surface of the continent with such rough tools that the storms have not worn
the marks out of it with all the polishing of ever so many thousand years?"
The Professor at the Breakfast Table, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr., 1964
The Roxbury Conglomerate displaying its sandstone matrix and variously-derived clasts
When I first moved to Massachusetts many years ago, I didn't know the first thing about geology. I had certainly heard of plate tectonics but didn't really understand it or knew nothing of its relevance. I never learned a thing about it in high school back in the 60's. Tectonics was barely in its infancy when I graduated. Now living in a western suburb of Boston, I was intrigued by the composition of the stone wall in my yard. In fact, all the walls in town looked the same. They were made of a sandy-textured stone with big, round rocks stuck in it. I read that it was called puddingstone and that it traveled a long distance to arrive here. That was the beginning of my geological journey, that wall. This post (and the one that follows), in fact my entire blog, is the result of that enlightenment.
The Roxbury Conglomerate is the state rock of Massachusetts, named as such in 1983. It forms much of the basement rock under the city of Boston and its surrounding environs. What's more, a great many of the older structures in Boston are constructed of it! What is the Roxbury Conglomerate? How did it form? When did it form? Why was it used as a building stone as opposed to other rocks that were more plentiful and more massive in New England? Much is known, but in spite of investigation and research that has spanned over a century, the depositional and tectonic history of the Roxbury Conglomerate and the Boston Basin, in which it is found, has remain somewhat controversial and enigmatic.
Geologists are partial to changing the names of large landmasses (also called cratons) and bodies of water in order to denote a change in the time frame, a potentially confusing situation for the layman (and even amateur geologist) but necessary nonetheless. Understanding such changes in nomenclature is relevant to our discussion in this post and in reading the literature. So, here's my attempt at a simplistic explanation.
The Earth;s tectonic plates have been rearranging the continents and oceans like pieces of an enormous jigsaw puzzle for many millions of years, actually billions. A continental landmass that existed during the Cambrian Period undoubtedly would have drifted to another location during say the later Permian Period. The system of nomenclature provides for the naming of a landmass during one time and location, and allows for a uniquely different name for the landmass during a different time and location. In that way, the name of the landmass automatically conveys a general time-frame and implies a specific relationship to other landmasses and bodies of water. It's that simple.
For example, North America is often referred to as proto-North America to indicate the continental landmass that existed any time before the modern one, obviously a very broad sense of time. More specifically, Laurentia refers to proto-North America during the early Paleozoic. During that time frame, as we shall see, the smaller terrane of Avalonia and Baltica (a micro-continent that eventually formed parts of  Europe, Scandinavia and Siberia) collided with Laurentia. That formed Laurussia (or proto-North America) during the Middle Paleozoic. Laurussia, in older, pre-tectonic terminology, is also referred to as the Old Red Sandstone continent during the Devonian. Laurasia is often used interchangeably in the literature for Laurussia (technically includes the additional accretion to Laurussia of the landmasses of Siberia, Kazakhstania, and the North China and East China cratons). During the late Paleozoic, the continent of Gondwana collided with Laurussia, and that formed the massive supercontinent of Pangaea, yet another proto-North America. Pangaea ultimately drifted apart during most of the Mesozoic, leaving Laurussia to become the modern continent of North America and all the remaining continents to be dispersed throughout the globe. You can follow the name changes on the various maps below taking note of their time frames.
By the way, we use the same concepts of nomenclature for bodies of water. The Iapetus Ocean (often called the proto-Atlantic Ocean) and Rheic Oceans that existed between Gondwana and Laurentia were consumed when Pangaea formed, only to give birth to its oceanic successor, the Atlantic Ocean, when Pangaea finally rifted apart. To quote the famous Scottish geologist John Hutton, "we find no vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end." 
In order to fully appreciate the origin and geologic history of the Roxbury Conglomerate let's examine the global "big picture" for the last billion years. In particular, let's trace the path that Avalonia assumed during its inception as a juvenile magmatic-arc, its accretion to, and subsequent drifting from the northern margin of Gondwana, it stectonic journey across the Iapetus Ocean, and its collision with eastern Laurentia. For, it is juvenile Avalonia where the Roxbury Conglomerate was deposited. Note that there is not universal acceptance amongst geologists regarding the timing and tectonic provenance of Avalonia's history.

Durng the late Precambrian (Neoproterozoic ca. 1100 Ma), a massive supercontinent commonly referred to as Rodinia formed and broke up (ca. 800 to 700 Ma). The timing of break-up and the exact fit of its elements remain sonewhat controversial. Regardless, Rodinia's rifting apart eventually spawned two smaller supercontinent siblings called Laurentia and Gondwana (also Gondwanaland). Gondwana included most of the continental landmasses in today's Southern Hemisphere. Proto-Avalonia (during the Proterozoic) has been suggested to possibly have a peri-Rodinian, island-arc provenance in spite of the fact that undisputed basement upon which it developed is nowhere, unequivocally exposed (with the exception of peri-Gondwanan terrane called Tregor-La Hague in northern France dated ~2 Ga). Regardless, the origin of the proto-Avalonian terrane remains controversial.


Dear readers and followers,
Google Blogger somehow corrupted this post making it unreadable, and so I'm re-writing it. It hopefully won't take longer than a day or two. Please check back. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Doctor Jack


  1. Fabulous. I love such a fantastically huge perspective on human existence. I wonder if such a perspective could positively alter human behaviour at all? Probably not! Thanks for all of this (gotta get back to work!)

  2. Hello,
    I am writing a paper and I wanted to use one of your images (458 million years ago) in it. In order to cite information correctly I need to know where did you get that image from?

  3. Sophia,
    As mentioned in the text of my post, the map is from